In partnership with
I was reviewing some old notes on balance training—nothing groundbreaking, just the usual vestibular stimulation protocols for athletes—when I noticed something odd in the metabolic markers. Not the expected improvements in reaction time or proprioception, but a quiet, consistent uptick in fasting glucose sensitivity in a subset of participants. No one was looking for it. The study wasn’t even about metabolism. But there it was, buried in the supplementary tables: a 12-15% improvement in HOMA-IR scores after six weeks of daily vestibular exercises. No dietary changes. No exercise adjustments. Just… spinning in a chair with their eyes closed.
Find therapy that works - 25% OFF your first month
Anxious? Depressed?
Find Therapy that finally works for you. BetterHelp offers personal, reliable mental health support from the comfort of your home, with 25% off your first month of therapy.
72% of clients see reduced symptoms within 12 weeks. BetterHelp is also HSA + FSA eligible, with a network of 30,000 licensed therapist to support your needs. Why wait? Get matched in as little as 48 hours.
This email was delivered by a third-party, on behalf of BetterHelp. Copyright © 2025 BetterHelp. All Rights Reserved.
This wasn’t an outlier. A quick, half-distracted search turned up three more papers—two from physical therapy journals, one from a vestibular rehab clinic—all reporting the same unintended effect. The mechanisms proposed were all over the place: some blamed sympathetic nervous system recalibration, others pointed to vestibular-hippocampal cross-talk affecting glucose regulation centers in the hypothalamus. One paper even suggested it was just an artifact of reduced stress (as if balance drills were some kind of covert meditation). But the pattern held. And no one in the biohacking world was talking about it.
Here’s the catch: it didn’t work for everyone. The responders tended to be people with baseline insulin resistance—or, curiously, those with a history of motion sickness. The non-responders? Often the same folks who’d adapted quickly to vestibular training, whose nervous systems barely registered the stimulus. It’s as if the metabolic effect wasn’t about the stimulation itself, but about the mismatch—the body’s struggle to recalibrate. That’s not how we usually think about insulin sensitivity. We talk about fasting, exercise, berberine, muscle contraction pathways. Not about the inner ear.
I tried it myself for a month—nothing fancy, just 10 minutes a day of slow head tilts and balance-board work. My continuous glucose monitor didn’t show the dramatic drops I’d seen in the studies, but there was a subtle shift: fewer post-meal spikes on days I did the drills, as if my body was handling glucose with a little less friction. Then again, I also slept better those nights, so maybe it was just the placebo of feeling like I’d done something vaguely scientific before bed.
The more I dig, the more this feels like one of those blind spots in the optimization space. We’ve spent years chasing mitochondrial pathways and gut microbiome tweaks, but the vestibular system—this ancient, primitive sensory hub—might be modulating metabolism in ways we’re only now stumbling into. And yet, no one’s rushing to turn it into a protocol. Maybe because it’s too simple. Too unsexy. Or maybe because the moment you try to standardize it, the effect disappears. The responders in those studies weren’t following a rigid routine; they were just… off-balance enough to trigger something.
I don’t have a neat takeaway here. Just a lingering question: how many other "metabolic levers" are hiding in plain sight, disguised as unrelated systems? And what else are we missing because we’re too busy optimizing the things we already understand?